Hip Resurfacing vs. Total Hip Replacement: Benefits & Candidacy
Hip Resurfacing: Bone-Preserving Alternative to THR
Resurfacing caps the femoral head with a metal hemisphere; the acetabulum receives a metal cup. The femoral neck is retained.
Advantages Over Total Hip Replacement
- Bone conservation: Facilitates future revision.
- Lower dislocation risk: Larger head diameter.
- More natural biomechanics: Preserves femoral neck length/version.
- Faster return to high activity: Running, impact sports often allowed.
- Smaller incision, less soft-tissue disruption.
Ideal Candidate
- Male, <60–65 years, good bone quality, high activity demand.
- Contraindicated: osteoporosis, large cysts, renal failure, metal allergy, women of childbearing age (metal ion concerns).
Current Status
Modern cobalt-chrome implants with improved bearing surfaces have reduced early failure rates. Long-term registries show excellent survivorship in selected patients. Shared decision-making essential.
Hip Replacement Surgery - Related Articles
- Clavicle ORIF Complications: Infection, Nonunion, Neurovascular Injury, and Hardware Issues
- Spinal Transplants: Why They're Not Feasible in Humans Today
- Artificial Hip Joint: Understanding Properties & Replacement
- Total Hip Replacement: Understanding Ceramic Prostheses & Recovery
- Paramedic Career with Scoliosis/Back Issues: Feasibility & Accommodations
- Post‑Hip Replacement Positioning: Protecting the New Joint
- Hip Cracking: Why Self-Manipulation Is Risky and When to See a Specialist
